Interesting — if slightly familiar-sounding — article from The Guardian this past week: Generation Game. It’s all kind of a cliché at this point (”They are nicknamed the diva generation - high maintenance, out for themselves, lacking in loyalty, thinking only in the short-term and their own place in it.”) but they do touch on a theme I’ve been seeing a lot lately:

Some see the debate as pie in the sky. “The suggestion that Generation Y isn’t just different by degrees, but that this is a disruptive generation, is clearly constructed by someone who doesn’t remember the mods and rockers, the teddy boys, the hippies, the punks and the student revolutions in 1968 Paris,” says Valerie Garrow, associate direct of the Institute for Employment Studies.

I struggle with this idea, because there’s a ring of truth to it. I doubt any young generation in history has conformed easily. What makes Generation Y so different, when every other generation has essentially had to give-in and start playing the same game that’s been going on for years.

The boomers speak loudly about this, because they were quintessentially counter-culture. They were so loud and unwilling to conform that we still make movies about their exploits and adventures in the 60s. But look at them now: they’re Gen Y’s bosses, whining about our lack of ‘work ethic’ and our damned iPods.

Will history, in effect, repeat itself?

I can’t answer that definitively. My time machine is mostly useless. But my gut says it won’t. I think some sectors will see more change than others, but I think overall Gen Y will work as a change effect across the board. Primarily, it’s demographics. We’re in a climate where employees are given little alternative but to look closely at Generation Y when hiring for prime positions. (This goes a long way to explain why we’re so often described as cocky and brash, too.)

More than just demographics, though, I think one of our chief qualitative differences is that we, as a generation, find our nonconformist roots not in anything societal or political but rather (mostly) technological. It’s a little less noble, but more laden with potential.

With the 60s, business didn’t have any real need to change to accommodate younger workers. Because they didn’t really need them. And, well, the changes the then younger generation was asking for seemed so out-of-this-world. The boomers asked for change, but it was not specific — it wasn’t backed up with real, tangible solutions.

Technology is the game changer, because technology is change. For better or for worse, all of business is going through change as a result, and now, as a Generation, younger workers have the opportunity to drive that change.

That’s new. That’s different. That’s powerful.

Generation Y Veneration has some predictions about working from home:

Despite the ability for many people in my industry (and other industries) to work from home everyday if they wanted to, they don’t.

Why?

Because nothing beats a face to face conversation.

I think it’s dangerous to conflate ‘working at home’ to ‘never leaving your house for work-related reasons’. The Generation Y-fueled change is not necessarily a shift towards impersonal business, but rather toward increased fluidity between work and life. Depending on the industry, your office can be a kitchen table, a coffee shop, a hotel lobby or a rented meeting space. Or, when it works, a virtualized online space.

It’s about being flexible and being open to new ways of work. Because, really, is there any real logic to the belief that work needs to be done collectively at a physical location with a water cooler and fluorescent lighting?

The aforementioned post by Ryan Healy sparked off a whole bunch of comments, as posts on Brazen Careerist tend to do. One, in particular, by a poster calling himself ‘jrandom42′ sparked some thinking.

The comment:

Bluntly put, nobody gets a free pass on anything, until they can prove to me that they can deliver results that positively affect my goals and bottom line.

In other words, show me you why deserve these exceptions from what everyone else has to adhere to, and then we’ll talk. And it’s still not guaranteed you’re going to get any of them.

I think this is a dangerous attitude that’s been cropping up a lot as this Generation Y hysteria works its way through businesses. It’s almost as if there are three stages of reaction to Generation Y in the workplace.

It tends to go:

1. Shock & Outrage - “When I was your age, I was damn lucky to get the job I had! I worked sixty hours a week breaking chunks of coal with nothing but my forehead. And at the end of the week, when my boss came by, I said THANK YOU.”
2. Dismissal - “Ha ha, whatever you say, kid. You just wait until you get a little older and see what’s out there in the REAL WORLD. Then you’ll be singing a different tune!”
3. Begrudging Acceptance - “Okay, sure, whatever. If you want to be a lazy jerk unlike EVERYONE ELSE IN THE HISTORY OF WORK than I GUESS you can have some slack. Provided you prove yourself to be a model employee under our current structure first. I’ll do you a FAVOUR.”

I think getting to stage three is enough for a lot of Gen Ys. Even though it comes with some passive aggression, at least your boss or manager is giving you the freedom you need. And, sure, it kind of sucked to have to slog through energy- and morale-sapping months to “prove yourself” but, if you’re creative and talented, you got through it. And then you were able to develop a situation that gave you at least some of the work-life balance and structure you were looking for in the first place.

But this isn’t how it should be.

Generation Y is not asking for special treatment. We’re not asking that you give us freedoms that other employees don’t have. Absolutely, things need to be broken down based on the type of responsibility of each job — if you’ve been hired to answer phones or paint cars, you probably can’t work from home — but that doesn’t mean things can’t be flexible, equitable and universal. Everyone who works for you should be afforded the same arrangement, within reason.

Quite frankly, this is the only way it can work. If you start letting your 23-year-old employee go home early because that’s the way he works best, your 10-year-veteran sales person who likes to stay a half hour after work hours just to show the bosses how dedicated he is (this is absolutely GROSS behaviour, by the way) is probably going to get upset.

Which tends to be where it gets complicated.

Look, I’d never argue that management is simple. With multiple generations in the workplace, it’s only going to get more complicated. But going the easy route, where you set blanket policies and only give flexibility when your younger employees demand it, is not a viable solution. To truly make the intergenerational office work, Generation Y needs to accelerate change for EVERYONE in the office, not just themselves.

Photo ‘Office Hours’ by shawnblog. Licensed under Creative Commons

Presumed Australian Valerie Khoo has a great blog post over at My Small Business. The title itself — “Harness Gen Y talent — even if you hate them” — amuses me to no end. And there’s some really smart stuff in here:

Many Gen-Ys have very different habits, interests and skills. Instead of ignoring them - or doing things like banning Facebook in the workplace - think about how you might be able to draw on them. I have a Gen-Y staff member in one of my businesses who watches Youtube in her lunch hour, loves her ipod and is interested in technology. About a year ago, she said she wanted to learn about creating audio and video. These tools had nothing to do with my business, which offers courses in writing. And I was concerned that she needed to be challenged with new ideas that piqued her interest at work.

So I asked her to come up with ways she could incorporate her interests into the business. After many brainstorming sessions, we created online courses (incorporating online audio and video) which now generate a whole new revenue stream for the business. When other businesses realised we were doing online audio (which are essentially podcasts) they came to us to create custom podcasts for them. So now we have yet another revenue stream for the business.

That’s a terrific example of where Generation Y has a huge amount of potential that is often overlooked. Gen Y employees are considered frustrating because they tend to ignore — or blatantly flaunt their disregard for — a lot of the ‘rules’ of the workplace, which in some cases have been around unchanged for more than fifty years. It’s a me-first attitude that can drive you up the wall.

But there’s a lot of potential in it, because — in contrast to the stereotypically bored, uninterested and unmotivated ’slackers’ of Gen X — Generation Y is noted for their huge interest in all sorts of things, particularly technology. Their interests — which are decidedly non-work-related in old-school thinking — can actually prove incredibly useful at work, especially when it comes to left-field thinking in advertising and community outreach.

The trick, of course, is finding that place where Generation Y’s interests turn into revenue tools and become of value to your business. The outcomes are not always easy to see — and I guess that makes some hate us — but the potential is hard to deny.

I don’t really know much about author Mark Bauerlein or his book The Dumbest Generation: How The Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future but my initial impression is not a good one.

Bauerlein recently contributed a Boston Globe piece on 8 reasons why this is the dumbest generation that achieves the rare double-feat of being both incredibly out-of-touch and remarkably ironic — it’s a piece that hopes to demonstrate how dumb, vacant and empty-headed Generation Y (and Gen Z, or Generation TBD, or whatever) is made up entirely of stock photos and three-sentence descriptors.

In any case, I think it’s supposed to be pithy and somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but even allowing for that it’s mostly stupid. So, in response, here are eight reasons why this is the smartest generation, presented without stock-photos and not split up across nine different pages.

They’re more politically & socially involved than ever before

Bauerlein writes that this generation is “encased in more immediate realities that shut out conditions beyond — friends, work, clothes, cars, pop music, sitcoms, Facebook.” This immediately brings to light the biggest problem with his arguments: while he claims to be criticizing this generation, he’s really just criticizing teenagers. Do teenagers tend to be egotistical and caught up in the goings-on of their own lives to the point of melodrama? They sure do. Is this a new phenomenon? Not at all.

Hell, the fact that Bauerlein thinks this generation is preoccupied by sitcoms shows how out-of-touch he is.

The big point is this, though: our generation is more politically involved and socially-conscious than ever before. Check out these stats from a USA Today article:

61% of 13- to 25-year-olds feel personally responsible for making a difference in the world, suggests a survey of 1,800 young people to be released today. It says 81% have volunteered in the past year; 69% consider a company’s social and environmental commitment when deciding where to shop, and 83% will trust a company more if it is socially/environmentally responsible. The online study — by two Boston-based companies, Cone Inc. and AMP Insights — suggests these millennials are “the most socially conscious consumers to date.”

They spend way less time watching TV and more time reading

Bauerlein trots out the old “Kids don’t READ any more!” argument, referring specifically to books. And, sure, books don’t sell great — they’re on the decline. But that doesn’t mean Gen Y doesn’t read. In fact, whereas the boomers and Gen X tended to employ television as their major source of media, Gen Y is turning to the internet. And even with advances in video & audio online, you know how the vast majority of the internet is experienced? By reading.

From an article in World News Australia:

The survey, commissioned by social networking website MySpace and conducted by UK-based analyst The Future Laboratory, found a quarter of 18 to 24-year-olds had reduced their television watching in favour of social networking on the web.

They have massive networks to call upon

Bauerlein brings up the abundance of typos, abbreviations and misspellings in IM and Texting communication as a point to prove this is a ‘dumb generation’. I don’t much like that kind of typing either, but it’s hardly a sign of ‘dumbness’. In fact, most of these short-forms emerge because Gen Y is trying to cultivate an absolutely astronomical number of friendships and relationships.

The networking we’re seeing with young people today is unprecedented and of incredible value to business. Whereas in the past people didn’t start building their networks until they were in their late teens or early twenties, this generation is establishing these connections at 12 years old.

They have a worldwide platform for expressing themselves creatively

Bauerlein makes the ridiculous argument that “On MySpace, if you write clearly and compose coherent paragraphs with informed observations on history and current events, ‘buddies’ will make fun of you.” I’m really not sure where he’s getting this, unless he’s hanging out in some really stupid corners of the internet.

One of the benefits to social networks, blogs and other online platforms is that young people can and do share their thoughts and ideas on everything from TV to video games to politics. The opportunity to make yourself visible at a young age leads to career and portfolio opportunities that were roadblocked before. Just look at the legion of bloggers who have found book deals.

They seek entertainment that’s active, not passive

Bauerlein points to the blockbuster sales of Grand Theft Auto 4 as a reason for this generation’s ‘dumbness’, but he doesn’t offer much in the way of argument. I’d make the argument that Gen Y’s appetite for video games as opposed to television or movies is a sign of intelligence, not anti-intellectualism.

Gen Y demands interactivity with their media. TV shows like Lost have derived popularity from the fact that fans love to come online and talk about them — develop theories and look for clues. Even American Idol, a show that takes a lot of crap for lacking substance, succeeds with youth because they feel like they can be a part of it.

Involvement, in a lot of respects, IS intelligence. There’s a lot more to be derived from playing Grand Theft Auto 4 than, say, watching an episode of Miami Vice.

They have quick access to an astounding amount of information

Bauerlein, again, makes a confusing argument: “Digital natives, however, go to the Internet not to store knowledge in their minds, but to retrieve material and pass it along. The Internet is just a delivery system.”

I don’t really know what he’s getting at, but that may be because I’m not storing enough knowledge in my mind. I just keep giving all my knowledge away to my online buddies!

One of my favourite archetypical Gen Y traits is their ability to quickly settle an argument. A group of people will be sitting around a table wondering, say, who Bob Dole’s Vice Presidential candidate was and suddenly, within seconds, someone will have pulled the answer from their laptop or cellphone. This tends to mystify the hell out of a lot of baby boomers.

If Gen Y memorizes less information, it’s because we know how to wield the enormous repository of information that is the internet.

They’re forcing huge changes in education

Education is a topic I’m passionate about, and there’s no doubt that a lot needs to change in the way teachers approach their Gen Y, and younger, students, but Bauerlein’s argument that we’re in an “era of child-centered classrooms and self-esteem grading” is just tired. Especially since nobody is really able to prove that today’s students are really lacking in the smarts department globally:

According to Reena Nadler, program director of LifeCourse Associates, a marketing and human resources consultancy in Great Falls, Virginia, founded by generational experts Neil Howe and William Strauss, the millennial generation is turning the clichés on their heads. “Student achievement is rising,” says Nadler, a millennial herself. Today’s youth dedicate more hours to their studies and extracurricular activities than previous generations did.

I think there’s very real issues that arise when the students are digital natives and the teachers barely know how to turn a computer on, and we’re seeing the fruits of that, but that doesn’t imply there’s anything inherently wrong with this generation. That they’re forcing change in the way education happens is actually a testament to their abilities.

Because we’re young

It looks like Bauerlein just plain runs out of arguments with his eighth point. He probably should have just gone with seven reasons. Seven is lucky. His eighth argument is simply “because they’re young.” And young people are… stupid.

He’s sort of right, actually. Young people lack experience and, indeed, tend to be egocentric and melodramatic and prone to screwing up (all part of learning). But youth also brings with it, by its very nature, an incredibly wellspring of potential, which is what a lot of companies are just starting to realize:

“We have the best qualified generation since history,” says Patricia Vendramin, a sociologist at the Work & Technology Research Centre of the Fondation Travail-Université in Namur, Belgium. Millennials get work experience early, they’re flexible, they’re willing to relocate, and they’re open-minded, she adds. Also, “they are very skilled at using technology” and they’re true team players, Redmond says.

So much left to say

It’s unfortunate that authors like Bauerlein are able to draw booksales by treading on the same old “kids are stupid” ground so many others have walked for decades. I bet when he was younger there were older people saying he was dumb, too. You would think that experience would have taught him better than trotting out this the-kids-aren’t-alright nonsense. But, then, maybe those calling him dumb back then just happened to be right.

Thanks to the Brazeen Careerist Forum for the link to this article.

Well, maybe not all of us. But most of us.

There’s a lot of hullabaloo in Ontario (and other places, I’m sure) these days about the struggling manufacturing sector. The Toronto Star in particular has been all over it:

While Canada’s economy continues to churn out jobs, some cities are getting left behind.

Amid waves of job cuts in the crucial automotive sector, Oshawa’s unemployment rate suddenly ranks among the highest of major Canadian cities, climbing to 7.6 per cent in April from 6.4 per cent the month before, according to Statistics Canada.

The loss of jobs sucks, of course, but I think cries from politicians for government subsidies to the manufacturing sector (a ‘bail out’) are completely misguiding. Saving manufacturing in the United States and Canada (and most of the developed world) isn’t just unlikely: It’s unfeasible.

We are becoming a service economy, which means that a lot of Generation Y is going to end up working in the so-called ’service sector’. A lot of people balk at this, because they immediately leap to everyone working at McDonalds or whatever, but the truth of it is that the service sector includes a whole whack of occupations and different styles of work, some of which pay minimum wage (ie. The McJob) and some of which pay millions of dollars a year (ie. a consultant).

The only real solution to job loss as a result of manufacturing is an acceptance that those jobs are gone. Governments should involve themselves only as far as providing opportunities to retrain the former manufacturer workers and create opportunities. The alternative is the equivalent of bailing out the water in a sinking ship — the only thing you can buy yourself is a little bit of time.

This puts Generation Y at an important crossroads. We’re going to experience a major economic shift from secondary to tertiary industry, and it’s not going to be without bumps in the road. We need to be prepared to embrace the new model of the service sector, and kick ass at it.

Dan Benjamin¹ writes about Offices and the Creativity Zone and makes about a million good points.

There’s no choice about how or when you’re expected produce, or under what circumstances. Here is your computer, here is your workstation, you have the tools, the florescent lights are turned on, why don’t you go ahead and get to work, thanks, bye.

I’m beginning to think that when you boil things down to their core, the modern day ‘knowledge worker’ has two functions: creation and collaboration. And for the latter, the office environment can be important. I love online collaboration environments as much as the next person, but there’s always something to be said for the face-to-face meeting, where ideas fly over the boardroom table. It’s a proven method, and will always be enough to justify traditional office space.

But the creative element is a whole different matter. For that we are uniquely individual in our needs and practices.

Unfortunately, most people can’t simply step into The [creative] Zone. In the very same way you’d want to find the right time and place to read a book, creative types need to setup the specific conditions they need to enter The Zone. For some people, this might mean listening to a certain kind of music. It might be fueled by caffeine and a dark room late at night. Some people work best in the silence of the early morning. It all depends on the person.

One of the major symptoms of the shift to the information age is that more and more of your employees are doing work that requires creativity. Stuff like answering phones, filling out forms, data entry, tech support, purchase order accounting and so on, is either less important or has been outsourced to another organization halfway around the world. In smaller businesses, especially, it’s important to understand that everyone can be (and should be) a creative worker, but it will only happen if you give them the flexibility, freedom and motivation to find their ‘creative zone’ in relation to the work you’ve asked them to do. And if that zone happens to be outside the wall of your office then, well, who cares?

And definitely don’t do this:

Of course it makes sense why corporations work this way, but that doesn’t mean that this is the right setting for creative people. The corporate world rewards based on perceived productivity rather than accomplishment. People who arrive at work at 8am, take a 30 minute lunch break (at their desk), and leave at 6pm are usually congratulated regardless of their real accomplishments, while those who struggle with corporate schedules but produce brilliant work (delivered on time) are often penalized.

The hour is an irrelevant metric in most work. Smash the clock.

1. Benamin, with John Gruber also regularly appears on the excellent podcast The Talk Show [↩]

Despite all anecdotal evidence, a lot of Gen Yers still tend to worry a lot about their potential in the job market. It’s probably due to the experiences their parents and older siblings may have had entering the workforce decades ago, struggling to find anything but the dreaded McJob. It’s so bad that this trepidation sometimes causes people to turtle themselves in academic institutions, piling on degrees and diplomas in the hopes of guaranteeing career potential right out of the gate.

The truth of the matter is that all that education, while undoubtedly important for other reasons, isn’t entirely necessary. Because, in the end, Generation Y’s secret weapon for career success is simply demographics.

Since the first wave of baby boomers reached the age of 60 in 2006 and have entered retirement, an increasing number of professionals are leaving the job market each year. So it’s not surprising that more than 80% of employers say they are concerned about a looming shortage of qualified workers.

There’s little reason today for Gen Y to fear the job hunt (though obviously this can’t hold true for all sectors — some are in steep decline) because there are simply more job openings coming down the pipeline than there are workers.

That said, the word ‘qualified’ in the above quote is extremely important. More on that in a later post.

I recently came across a great post at Ian Selvarajah’s blog on the correlation between Generation Y and the management theory called ‘boreout’.

You would think that the “best of the best” would be highly productive and contributing a lot to their organizations right? Wrong. Oddly enough, despite several of us getting very good jobs with prestigious firms in a variety of industries and decent pay, many are unhappy with our jobs, primarily because we’re bored!

I had never heard of ‘Boreout’ before (though it must be a real thing — it has a wikipedia entry) but it’s certainly a familiar concept. It’s the opposite of ‘burnout’, which is when an employee has too much challenging work on his or her plate. With ‘boreout’, the employee has too little.

The truth about most of us Gen Yers who work office jobs is that we often ARE bored. Employers and managers tend to blame the internet (and namely facebook these days) as a sapper of productivity in office environments, but I think that’s putting the cart before the horse. We don’t forsake work to surf, we surf because we’re bored with work. And sometimes because we don’t even have any work to do.

Causes? I can think of a couple.

‘Climbing the Ladder’ Syndrome

The first is the old career-centric dynamic, where big companies hired people (often with WAY less education and experience than entry-level employees have now) and ‘grew’ them inside the company. It’s the old story about starting in the mailroom and working your way up to the corner office. Gen Y knows this is BS, though, and those of us (especially the top of the class types) starting out are going to get bored fast if we’re sitting around doing data entry while other people do the real meaty work.

Gen Y is not patient. Expecting them to ‘wait their turn’ is going to absolutely lead to hardcore burnout.

Exceeding ‘realistic’ time expectations

The second cause may be more anecdotal, but I thought I’d throw it out there and see what sort of response it gets. See if this scenario is familiar:

You’re starting at a new job and are given a few tasks to get your feet wet. They expect that these tasks will take you a week to complete. You finish in two days. So, being a good employee, you report that you’re done to your manager and ask for more tasks. But the cycle continues, as you continuously finish tasks days before you’re expected to. Eventually, the act of continuously having to come up with new things for you to do seems to start to annoy your boss, who is likely burned out with their own work.

The result? You start to wait. Give yourself a buffer. Finish a task, surf for an hour, hang out at the watercooler, and then see if there’s anything else you need to be doing. Short-term it can actually feel like a nice respite from having to do work all day long. Long-term it can easily manifest itself as the dreaded boreout.

The beginnings of a solution

The real solution to both issues is likely exceedingly complicated, requiring a whole new shift in management thinking. But to simplify it, I’d say it just comes down to this: encourage your young employees to be self-directed. Give them tasks, set deadlines, and if they exceed them, then encourage them to focus on more educational endeavors in their newfound ‘free’ time: learn a new computer program, start a company blog, study a new programming language or research new design trends. Google’s 20 percent time is a good model of self-directedness because not only has it led to a lot of awesome google products but it also means that managers don’t have to manage so much.

Gen Y is complicated, requiring you to be hands-off in some ways and hands-on in others, but the self-directedness is at the core of our attitude toward work. Some might characterize it as impatience, but it more has to do with just wanting to get things done without others standing in the way.

Photo by phoenixdailyphoto. Licensed under Creative Commons

BusinessWeek had an article last week full of tips for employers on how to communicate with Gen Y employees. For the most part, it was kind of useless - ValleyWag even called them on it - made up of platitudes like “Don’t manage, mentor” and “Don’t conceal, communicate”, which run the gamut between obvious and oblivious but don’t get anywhere near real value.

I’m not exactly sure why older generations are having trouble communicating with Generation Y. They seem to regard us like they would a foreign language, looking to books and consultants and lists-disguised-as-articles for explanations on how to best learn what makes us tick.

But the dirty little secret behind all of this is that a lot of managers aren’t just looking for information about us — our habits, culture, attitudes, and so on –, they’re also looking for information on how to control. These employers don’t want to adapt. They’d much rather just figure out how to BS their way into the appearance of Gen Y friendliness.

They want to harness this changed workforce without ever really acknowledging our differences.

The only tip employers really need for communicating with Gen Y is this: don’t BS. Be honest. Speak plainly and directly. Don’t lean on hierarchies, memos, policies and procedures. Keep your explanations straightforward. And don’t you ever use the “because I’m your boss” card.

That may seem like a lot, but it’s really not. It all boils down to a simple “No BS” rule. Try that, and all the other ‘tips’ you need will start to fall into place.

Photo by fabblo. Licensed under Creative Commons